When Artificial Intelligence Redraws the Rules of Sports
Artificial intelligence (AI) is gradually revolutionizing the world of sports, particularly in the realm of refereeing and rule enforcement. Technologies like VAR (Video Assistant Referee) in football and the Hawk-Eye system in tennis illustrate this evolution, bringing more precision and transparency to decision-making. However, these advancements also spark debates about their impact on the spirit of the game and the role of human referees.
VAR in Football: A Controversial Revolution
Introduced in football to minimize human errors, VAR has become a staple in major competitions like the World Cup and the Champions League. The main purpose of this technology is to assist referees in critical situations such as goals, penalties, direct fouls, and offsides. VAR relies on multiple cameras and image recognition algorithms to analyze real-time actions, ensuring fairer decisions.
However, despite its undeniable success in reducing glaring mistakes, VAR faces criticism for its impact on the flow of the game. Some players and fans believe that the excessive precision of VAR, especially in millimetric offside decisions, undermines the spontaneity of football. Additionally, interruptions due to video reviews can disrupt the natural rhythm of matches, raising questions about balancing technology with the fluidity of the game.
Hawk-Eye in Tennis: A Successful Adoption
While VAR has divided opinions in football, Hawk-Eye has been more favorably received in tennis. Introduced to track the trajectory of balls with millimetric precision, this electronic system determines whether a ball is in or out with certainty. Although it initially faced skepticism from some players, like Roger Federer, Hawk-Eye is now widely integrated into most major tournaments.
Hawk-Eye's adoption was eased by its ability to deliver instant decisions, minimizing interruptions and increasing players' confidence in the officiating. Unlike football, where subjectivity can influence decisions, the binary nature of line calls in tennis lends itself perfectly to a visual tracking technology like Hawk-Eye.
Towards a New Balance?
Artificial intelligence has transformed officiating and rule enforcement in sports competitions, with systems like VAR and Hawk-Eye becoming essential tools for ensuring fairness. However, the adoption of these technologies is not without its controversies. While they bring greater accuracy and fairness, they also raise questions about the role of humans in sports and the impact on the spectator experience. As these technologies evolve, the challenge will be to strike a balance between technical progress and preserving the spirit of the game.
AI as a Tool for Fairer Officiating
Actually, AI has the potential to make officiating in sports more just across various disciplines. Technologies like VAR and Hawk-Eye offer crucial support to referees, helping them correct potential judgment errors, especially in situations where a foul or key moment might have been missed or misinterpreted. This technological assistance is essential for reducing injustices and ensuring more objective decisions. However, it is important to ensure that AI remains a complementary tool and does not fully replace human referees. In certain scenarios, human insight and emotions are critical, particularly when making decisions that could significantly alter the outcome of a football match, tennis game, NBA contest, or any competition with high stakes. Indeed, human presence adds to the games a level of sensitivity, empathy and contextual understanding that technology, no matter how advanced, for now at least, cannot fully replicate.
The Importance of Human Judgment in Sports like Figure Skating
An iconic example of the importance of human judgment in sports is figure skating, particularly during events like the Olympic Games. Figure skating is evaluated not only on technical criteria such as jumps and spectacular moves, but also on artistic and subjective elements, like musical interpretation, fluidity, and expression.
While AI can analyze jumps and detect technical errors, it cannot yet accurately assess aspects such as emotion, creativity, and overall artistic performance. These subjective factors often distinguish a good routine from a truly memorable one. Human judges also consider the competition's context, the emotional pressure on athletes, and even cultural elements that may influence artistic interpretation.
See the article by Arina Nalbandian on our Linkedin
Don't miss next article on our blog by The Consultancy Group.
